The UK's only dedicated gundog magazine
Tim Finley pits the Gletcher Luger and Webley MkVI against each other in this comparison review of two iconic World War II pistols.
To continue reading this content please register for our newsletter.
Please read our policy notice for details of how we use your data.
I am registered, skip this step
Shooting and reviewing the new .22 pellet-firing Webley MKVI made me look at some of my other World War Two pistols. All of them are 4.5mm/.177 BB-firing and I wanted to pitch two of them against each other in an ‘Axis versus the Allies’ duel. There are many really iconic and recognisable pistols, but not many outdo the Luger, and even fewer outdo a CO2 Luger action that operates like the real thing. The semi-automatic pistol has a unique toggle action, and was used by Germany in both world wars. This CO2 Luger is produced in the USA by Gletcher, whose slogan is ‘military precision’.
The Luger’s adversary is the British Webley MkVI Service revolver, which also fires 4.5mm steel BBs through a smoothbore barrel – the BBs are held in the nose of six faux .455 cartridges housed in the rotating cylinder of the gun. Both pistols are powered via a single standard 12 gram CO2 bulb housed in their grips.
To keep a level playing field, the Webley is shot in double-action only because the Luger cannot be shot in single action. The Luger’s double-action trigger weight is 4kg, and the Webley’s only slightly lighter at 3.7kg, so neither had an advantage trigger-wise, it seemed. The Luger has one disadvantage and that’s the blow-back action moving the pistol on each shot, but it has the advantage of being quicker to fire, due to the blow-back action.
The trigger operation on the Webley has to move the cylinder around to the next BB-loaded cartridge before it can fire a shot, but there is no recoiling action – the only recoil is the expelled gases. It was be interesting, for sure! The two contenders also used the same BBs and CO2 bulbs.
There wasn’t much in it when it came to double-action shooting each pistol for five-shot groups – just over a millimetre, to be precise. Next was how accurately I could hit my six swinging IPSC targets on six runs. I was semi-speed shooting, instinctively breaking the shot when the sights came onto the target. This was a realistic simulation of their use in WWII.
No. of hits on each 6-shot run
The MkVI was easier to shoot quickly on multiple targets due to the way the double-action trigger worked. I was able to start moving the trigger nano-seconds after the shot broke on one target, and when I was moving my aim to the next. The trigger on the Luger wasn’t much heavier on the trigger gauge, but it was certainly harder to operate because the recoiling blow-back action also moved the gun about.
You can still buy these two WWII CO2 pistols, and I did try out another two WWII CO2s – a Crosman 338 and C41, both modelled on the German Walther P38, but they are discontinued models, I’m sad to say.
I expected to have more perfect runs of six and to be better at it than I was, but I was not aiming (sorry for the pun) for six, slow aimed shots, that would have tested and proved nothing. It was a much more realistic test of the two guns actual functionality.
The Luger is a lot of fun to shoot due to its recoil and the toggle action moving up and down, but it’s very gas hungry. The Webley is very pointable and accurate with a massive amount of shots available to the user and in my tests, the Webley came out on top – there are other WWII CO2 pistols out there, though – I covered the 1911/45 Auto a couple of issues back in Airgun World magazine.
Remember to wear eye protection at all times when shooting steel BBs.
The UK's only dedicated Gun Dog magazine
Register for our newsletters to receive tips and advice direct to your inbox.
Choose one or more and receive content relevant to you!
More information |
If you choose to block cookies some parts of this website may not operate. To block cookies please do this within your browser settings. Most browsers allow you to block cookies within their settings and we have provided links to the most commonly used browsers.
Please view our cookie details page for more information on the cookies we use.